alternative health Blog cancer cancer prevention cancer risk Cell Phones electromagnetic fields emf Featured Genetically Modified Organisms Health health food ionizing radiation Nutrition Opinion organic food Peroxynitrite raw food raw food life Robert Ross Science Technology vegan vegetarian Wellness whole food

Cell Phones, Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) & the Risk of Cancer

Although the firms concerned have worked long and exhausting to make everybody consider that cell telephones are protected, here’s what really occurs — cell vibratory receptor proteins sense electromagnetic radiation and react to them as a danger. Within a couple of seconds they reply with cell membrane compression which ultimately impairs intercellular communication and organ perform. Long-term publicity may cause cell dying as a result of the build up of free radicals in the cells. It will possibly take 18 months for such damaged cells to be replaced with good cells assuming the supply of electromagnetic radiation is gone.

While nearly everyone you realize has a cellular phone, and doubtless has for a decade, you in all probability don’t know anybody that has a mind tumor. Yearly about 80,000 males, ladies and youngsters in America are recognized with a mind tumor. Comparatively, virtually 10 occasions extra individuals (800,000) die yearly from heart disease. So the rarity of brain cancer might make you assume that your cellphone is protected to use. When over 90% of U.S. adults has a cellphone and solely zero.02% get mind most cancers, you may assume that it’s OK to use a cellphone. Except, nevertheless, the actual injury just isn’t truly brain tumors … the real hazard is from the reactive nitrogen species peroxynitrites which may injury your mitochondria.

Peroxynitrite is an unstable ion produced in your body after nitric oxide is exposed to superoxide. This complicated chemical course of starts with low-frequency microwave publicity from your cellular phone and Wi-Fi router, as well as from close by cellular phone towers. And with 5G, cell towers will probably be a lot closer to you than ever.

!n your physique, peroxynitrites react with sure proteins creating modifications seen in human biopsies of atherosclerosis, myocardial ischemia, inflammatory bowel disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and septic lung illness.

First, microwave radiation stimulates the manufacturing of calcium inside your cells and mitochondria. With this additional calcium present, nitric oxide is then activated in the cells. Nitric oxide is requires calcium to activate. It’s current in all animals and has numerous well being benefits, however it can be damaging when an ionized oxygen molecule is released during pathological change, producing peroxynitrites, believed to be one underlying causes for some of at this time’s continual illnesses.

Reactive nitrogen species like peroxynitrite can remove an electron and injury the DNA inside the mitochondria and nucleus of your cells. This pathway of oxidative destruction triggered by low-frequency radiation emitted from cellular units might explain the phenomenal progress fee of persistent illnesses in the final 25 years. This can be a far, far higher drawback than mind tumors in terms of cellular phone hazards.

Protecting Yourself!

There are several methods to guard your self from EMFs. The primary considerations in your house are cell phones, moveable phones and Wi-Fi routers/modems. Keep in mind, although you are feeling protected to use your telephone since you don’t feel the health results instantly, but that’s most undoubtedly not the case!

  • Hold your telephone away out of your head: You need to use a selfie-stick, activate the speaker telephone or use a headset. Attempt to maintain your conversations brief and do more texting than talking to attenuate publicity.
  • Improve your distance from sources of EMF: The nearer the system, the more EMF you’re exposed to. Avoid putting your telephone in your pants pocket or on your belt. And please don’t keeps telephone and tablets by your bedside.
  • Sure spices help scale back injury: Spices rich in phenolics, resembling cloves, rosemary, turmeric, cinnamon and ginger, have shown some protective capability to guard from injury brought on by peroxynitrites.
  • Turn off your Wi-Fi: When not in use, turn your Wi-Fi, modem and cellphone off.

Please don’t rely on any of the many that promise to block EMF radiation — they do a terrible job. There’s even less you are able to do about the 5G radiation that shall be all around you in the future — besides taking political action now, when you still could make a differemce!

5G is an Even Greater Drawback for Our Planet

Even more disturbing, if that’s potential, 5G know-how puts our environmental at risk in a quantity of ways. First, it might pose a critical menace to plant well being. One research showed that the leaves of aspen seedlings uncovered to RFR exhibited signs of necrosis, whereas one other Armenian research advised low-intensity RFR prompted “peroxidase isoenzyme spectrum changes.”  That’s a stress response that damages cells in wheat shoots. P

In addition, the 5G infrastructure might threaten our planet’s environment. The 5G network will require deployment of many, short-lifespan suborbital satellites shot into orbit by hydrocarbon rocket engines. In California a research discovered that launching too many of these will pollute the international environment affecting ozone distribution and temperatures. Even worse, solid-state rocket exhaust incorporates chlorine, an ozone-destroying chemical.

Lastly, 5G might threaten our pure ecosystems. In accordance with several stories, low-level, non-ionizing microwave radiation affects hen and bee health. It drives birds from their nests and causes plume deterioration, locomotion issues, decreased survivability and dying. And bee populations endure from decreased egg-laying talents of queen bees and smaller colony sizes. In a 2012 meta-study, they discovered that 593 of 919 analysis research recommend that RFR adversely impacts crops, animals and humans.

Over the previous few many years, authorities regulatory businesses have grow to be financially entangled with the firms they’re regulating. Actually, businesses like the FDA and FCC are actually partially funded by the very companies they’re supposedly regulating. Even worse, the heads of these businesses are wanting forward to comfortable jobs in the personal sector once they “retire” from their Federal jobs  — or conversely you’ll find corporate executives appointed to these delicate Federal positions. At the very least, this can be a large breach of public belief.

In Dirty Electricity: Electrification and the Illnesses of Civilization, Sam Milham, MD, exhibits how the illnesses of trendy civilization — heart illness, cancer, diabetes, and so forth. — are associated to this missed trigger. Dr. Milham exhibits us why so many of these illnesses have been growing during the final 100 years, explaining the connection between illness and electricity. Authorities has did not do something or has been bought. So the business utterly ignores the risks while growing our exposure. Business leaders show no concern as our declining health bankrupts the nation.

The cellular phone business likes to say hundreds of research on their safety. However the unique research have been about microwave ovens NOT cell phones. Sneaky buggers — you see, microwave ovens and cell phones have comparable radiation, however not similar! And, of course, microwave ovens usually are not held subsequent to your ear.

The media began to complain about the lack of critical studies on the health results of cell phones when Congressional hearings made it clear there truly have been no studies on their safety at all — and no FDA or EPA oversight.  So the cellular business promised to do their own research — the fox guarding the hen home precept. Surprisingly, after an enormous research challenge the end result of all their work contradicted the business’s declare that cell phones have been protected. The research showed that mind most cancers was 3 occasions extra prevalent in heavy cellphone customers. Non-malignant tumors of the auditory nerve (behind the ear where we hold our telephones) and chromosome injury have been extra possible. A couple of other researchers also discovered troubling results, reminiscent of DNA injury in human blood cells from mobile radiation. But these studies have been very new at the time so their reliability was unknown.

In 1997, an Australian researcher revealed the first vital scientific evidence that cell phones might cause cancer in mice. But many “scientists” nonetheless questioned whether or not mouse research could possibly be applied to individuals. In 1998,  a Swedish scientist reported that elevated use of cell phones showed a corresponding improve in complications and fatigue. The research of over 15,000 individuals showed as a lot as a 600% improve in dizziness, headaches and discomfort as utilization elevated from 2 minutes a day to over an hour. Leakage in the blood mind barrier was cited as a attainable trigger.

Quickly, one other alarming research found that cellphone radiation induced genetic injury in human blood cells. The relationship between cancer and cell fragments, referred to as micronuclei, is so highly effective that docs throughout the world check them to see if patients are more likely to develop most cancers. The preliminary results confirmed virtually 300% improve in genetic injury when human blood cells have been uncovered to cellular phone radiation.

In fact the business didn’t need to consider this in order that they repeated the research with tighter controls, but the nonetheless saw genetic injury. In another research, cellular phone customers have been virtually 2.5 occasions more more likely to develop these neuro-epithelial tumors.  And yet one more research looked at a rare noncancerous tumor affecting the auditory nerve —  and noticed a 60% larger probability of acoustic neuromas for people who had used cell telephones for 6 years or more. The longer they used a cellphone, the larger the danger. Lastly, a research, of 285,000 cellular phone customers found a better fee of brain most cancers deaths amongst cellular phone users who maintain the antenna subsequent to their heads.

Round 2009, researchers at the National Toxicology Program (NTP) uncovered rodents to radio frequency radiation levels at round what heavy cellular phone customers get daily. The researchers discovered that as the rats have been uncovered to higher intensities of electromagnetic fields (EMF), extra of them developed uncommon types of brain and coronary heart most cancers — demonstrating a direct dose–response relationship. Conversely, none of the rats in the “control group” (not exposed to the radiation) developed such tumors.

Earlier research had never discovered that this sort of radiation was related to such cancers, however none of those research adopted as many animals for as lengthy or with the similar  depth exposures. The findings shocked some scientists who had been intently tracking the research. “I was surprised because I had thought it was a waste of money to continue to do animal research in this area. There had been so many studies before that had pretty consistently not shown elevations in cancer. In retrospect the reason for that is that nobody maintained a sufficient number of animals for a sufficient period of time to get results like this,” one scientist said.

The Injury from Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) is Alarmingly Real

Electromagnetic fields (EMF) is associated with cancer, focus issues, ADD, tinnitus, migraines, insomnia, arrhythmia, Parkinson’s and even again ache.  For individuals delicate to EMF simply strolling into a coffee store with WiFi can set off an array of symptoms resembling headache, fatigue, nausea, burning and itchy pores and skin and muscle aches. A cordless telephone base station 2 ft out of your head for 3 minutes can noticeably disrupt your heart rhythm, triggering greater coronary heart charges, arrhythmias and different issues. The EMF results on the coronary heart in one research have been found at solely .3% of the FCC’s advisable publicity limits

44980406 - electromagnetic fields (EMF)Cell Telephone Health Dangers

At the moment, electromagnetic fields (EMF) are surrounding us all the time. Some are natural like the solar, which provides off power all through the whole electromagnetic spectrum. The earth’s environment could be very selective about which radiations and lightweight to let in and which to maintain out and all dwelling organisms have tailored to this. However in the last 100 years humans have been busily including their very own varieties of electromagnetic energies — often without even a considered the organic consequences. For instance, the protective ozone layer in the stratosphere is getting depleted and letting in additional dangerous energies from the sun. And 5G methods might be the worst offenders but.

The poisonous effects of ionizing radiation, reminiscent of X-rays  gamma rays and ultraviolet radiation (UV) are properly understood. Nevertheless, non-ionizing radiation (radar, radio frequency radiation, lasers and very low frequency ELF’s) can have very detrimental impact at surprisingly low exposures. This is notably true when low publicity levels are combined with long durations of exposure (continual publicity). With 5G techniques, will truly be dwelling in a “fog” of radiation throughout us and in our face — all the time!

In our fast-paced, industrialized society, we spend most of our time indoors or in automobiles, away from the natural background radiation that is normally life-sustaining. As an alternative, we substitute that wholesome radiation with electronic devices, digital units and an entire vary of unnatural sources of electromagnetic fields (EMF) that not often occur naturally. This leads to a deficiency of natural radiation publicity, replaced as an alternative with unnatural, unhealthy radiation exposure from man-made sources alien to our natural world and our our bodies.

How you can take action proper now:
  • Understand EMFs and their behaviors
  • Shield your self with an EMF Defend that neutralizes the dangerous effects of EMF emitting units.
  • Restrict your publicity with an anti-radiation headset or through the use of the speaker telephone mode in your cellular phone.
  • Refuse to use 5G telephones and units and discourage these you understand from doing so.
  • Refuse to buy something ‘smart’ – ‘smart’ home equipment, ‘smart’ heaters, and so forth.
  • Carry shungite crystals to guard your self from radiation. Click on right here to see these on Amazon.
  • No matter what, DO NOT let your electrical firm install a so-called sensible meter  on your home– these put high ranges of 5G radiation proper into your house.
  • Be a part of the rising numbers of dissenters. Click right here to get lively with them.
  • Legally threaten sensible meter and 5G tech installers with legal responsibility. Find out how here.
  • Study to take pleasure in more healthy, natural and alkaline-forming uncooked meals in your weight loss plan.

The Raw Food Connection

There is a profound connection between alkaline-forming Raw Meals and ionizing radiation. You see, ionizing radiation does the similar thing to your body cooked, processed, acid-forming foods do only much, much quicker and more deadly. Merely put, ionizing radiation scavenges electrons from the molecules of wholesome cells in the similar means that the free radicals in cooked, processed meals does. The acidic toxins brought on by cooked, processed foods will slowly kill you. The results from ionizing radiation are often a lot quicker and more deadly however the principle is the similar — raw food can truly shield you from radiation!

The first, most elementary factor you are able to do right now’s to drink alkaline water, additionally referred to as alkaline mineral water, often made with a water Ionizer. Some are additionally out there in bottles (7.0 pH and higher are alkaline):

  • Essentia ensures a pH of 9.5.
  • Smartwater has a pH of about 7.0.
  • Evian has a pH of 7.2.

The subsequent factor you are able to do right now’s to eat more alkalizing uncooked meals to help shield you from radiation.

Chosen References
  1. https://www.statista.com/statistics/274774/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-worldwide/
  2. https://eluxemagazine.com/magazine/dangers-of-5g/
  3. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/radiation/cell-phones-fact-sheet
  4. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/major-cell-phone-radiation-study-reignites-cancer-questions/
  5. H. Lai and N. P. Singh, “Acute exposure to a 60 Hz magnetic field increases DNA strand breaks in rat brain cells,”Bioelectromagnetics 18 (2) (1997): 151-165.

  6. L. G. Salford, A. E. Brun, Okay. Sturesson, J. L. Eberhardt, L. and B. R. Persson, “Permeability of the blood-brain barrier induced by 915 MHz electromagnetic radiation, continuous wave and modulated at 8, 16, 50, and 200 Hz,” Microscopy Research and Method 27 (6) (1994): 535-542.

  7. M. Repacholi, “Low-level exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs,”Bioelectromagnetics 19 (1) (1998): 1-19.

  8. M. Sandström, J. Wilen, G. Oftedal, and Okay. Delicate, “Mobile phone use and subjective symptoms: Comparison of symptoms experienced by users of analogue and digital mobile phones,” Occupational Drugs (London) 51 (1) (2001): 25-35.

  9. R. R. Tice, G. G. Hook, M. Donner, D. I. McRee, and A. W. Guy, “Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals: Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells,” Bioelectro-magnetics 23 (2) (2002): 113-126

  10. G. Carlo and R. Jenrow, “Scientific Progress – Wireless Phones and Brain Cancer: Current State of the Science,” Medscape Common Drugs 2 (2) (2000).

  11. Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, et al. Effects of cellular phone radiofrequency sign exposure on mind glucose metabolism. JAMA 2011; 305(eight):808–813.[PubMed Abstract]
  12. Kwon MS, Vorobyev V, Kännälä S, et al. GSM mobile phone radiation suppresses brain glucose metabolism. Journal of Cerebral Blood Movement and Metabolism 2011; 31(12):2293-301.[PubMed Abstract]
  13. Kwon MS, Vorobyev V, Kännälä S, et al. No results of short-term GSM cell phone radiation on cerebral blood stream measured utilizing positron emission tomography. Bioelectromagnetics 2012; 33(three):247-56.[PubMed Abstract]
  14. Worldwide Agency for Research on Cancer. Non-ionizing Radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic FieldsExit Disclaimer. Lyon, France: IARC; 2013. IARC monographs on the analysis of carcinogenic dangers to people, Volume 102.
  15. Hirose H, Suhara T, Kaji N, et al. Mobile phone base station radiation does not affect neoplastic transformation in BALB/3T3 cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2008; 29(1):55–64. [PubMed Abstract]
  16. Oberto G, Rolfo Okay, Yu P, et al. Carcinogenicity research of 217 Hz pulsed 900 MHz electromagnetic fields in Pim1 transgenic mice. Radiation Analysis 2007; 168(3):316–326.[PubMed Abstract]
  17. Zook BC, Simmens SJ. The consequences of pulsed 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the promotion of neurogenic tumors in rats. Radiation Analysis 2006; 165(5):608–615.[PubMed Abstract]
  18. Cardis E, Richardson L, Deltour I, et al. The INTERPHONE research: design, epidemiological methods, and outline of the research population. European Journal of Epidemiology 2007; 22(9):647–664.[PubMed Abstract]
  19. The INTERPHONE Research Group. Brain tumour danger in relation to cellular telephone use: outcomes of the INTERPHONE international case-control research. International Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 39(3):675–694.[PubMed Abstract]
  20. Larjavaara S, Schüz J, Swerdlow A, et al. Location of gliomas in relation to cellular phone use: a case-case and case-specular analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 2011; 174(1):2–11.[PubMed Abstract]
  21. Schüz J, Jacobsen R, Olsen JH, et al. Cellular telephone use and cancer danger: replace of a nationwide Danish cohort. Journal of the Nationwide Cancer Institute 2006; 98(23):1707–1713.[PubMed Abstract]
  22. Frei P, Poulsen AH, Johansen C, et al. Use of cell phones and danger of mind tumours: replace of Danish cohort research. British Medical Journal 2011; 343:d6387.[PubMed Abstract]
  23. Benson VS, Pirie Okay, Schüz J, et al. Cell phone use and danger of brain neoplasms and different cancers: Potential research. Worldwide Journal of Epidemiology 2013; 42(3): 792-802.[PubMed Abstract]
  24. Benson VS, Pirie Okay, Schüz J, et al. Authors’ response to: the case of acoustic neuroma: comment on mobile phone use and danger of mind neoplasms and other cancers. Worldwide Journal of Epidemiology 2014; 43(1):275. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt186.
  25. Coureau G, Bouvier G, Lebailly P, et al. Cell phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control research. Occupational and Environmental Drugs 2014; 71(7):514-522.[PubMed Abstract]
  26. Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson Delicate Okay. Pooled analysis of case-control studies on malignant brain tumours and the use of cellular and cordless phones including dwelling and deceased subjects. International Journal of Oncology 2011; 38(5):1465–1474.[PubMed Abstract]
  27. Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Corridor P, et al. Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor danger. American Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 161(6):526–535.[PubMed Abstract]
  28. Aydin D, Feychting M, Schüz J, et al. Mobile phone use and mind tumors in youngsters and adolescents: a multicenter case-control research. Journal of the Nationwide Cancer Institute 2011; 103(16):1264–1276.[PubMed Abstract]
  29. Inskip PD, Hoover RN, Devesa SS. Brain most cancers incidence tendencies in relation to cellular phone use in the United States. Neuro-Oncology 2010; 12(11):1147–1151.[PubMed Abstract]
  30. Deltour I, Johansen C, Auvinen A, et al. Time developments in mind tumor incidence rates in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 1974–2003. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009; 101(24):1721–1724.[PubMed Abstract]
  31. Deltour I, Auvinen A, Feychting M, et al. Cell phone use and incidence of glioma in the Nordic nations 1979–2008: consistency verify. Epidemiology 2012; 23(2):301–307.[PubMed Abstract]
  32. Little MP, Rajaraman P, Curtis RE, et al. Mobile phone use and glioma danger: comparability of epidemiological research results with incidence developments in the United States. British Medical Journal 2012; 344:e1147.[PubMed Abstract]
  33. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. (eds).  SEER Cancer Statistics Assessment, 1975-2012, Nationwide Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Retrieved January 11, 2016.

Additionally Read:

Fukushima Again in the News – The Raw Food Radiation Connection

About the author

Admin